Is “Competitiveness” a strength or a weakness?
Posted: August 26th, 2006 | Author: Jeff | Filed under: Business, Philosophy, Poker, Uncategorized | 1 Comment »currently listening to: Andras Schiff playing Mendelssohn’s Songs Without Words (selected)
While reading the Businessweek “Competition” Issue, I wondered how I measured up to my peers in terms of “competitiveness”. Here’s what I know about myself (based on my experiences):
1. I’m not very good playing second fiddle; i need to be el maestro.
2. I like to study people’s intentions, desires, and fears. In short, I enjoy applying game theory to practically everything I do. I believe these are essential for effective negotiating and understanding people.
3. Nothing motivates me more than when another underestimates me (I make them regret it). Controlled anger can be a powerful force. I’m usually at my best under those circumstances and believe me, nothing is more inspirational than the thought of my slighters/doubters wiping their own dung off their faces.
4. I’m not sure if this was by chance or what, but I don’t remember ever getting picked on by a bully. There may have been non-bullies who tried to pick on me, but usually I got them to cut it out :)
5. You can’t put me on a hand (don’t even try). I’ve had people tell me that they can ‘read’ me, but so far, those who’ve made such a claim have lost huge pots against me shortly afterwards.
For the record, the above is simply my way of motivating myself to keep improving.
I would rate myself a 9.5 out of 10 for ‘competitiveness’. But is that necessarily a good thing?


It’s good at times. You can keep my damn 50 bucks
competitiveness though, is bad… especially if you’re chasing tail. Being overly aggressive doesn’t work. Sometimes it does, but in that case it’s usually not long term.